On September 5, 2026, Quebec’s judicial authorities released new guidelines that explicitly state generative artificial intelligence cannot serve as a substitute for a judge’s own reasoning. The directive follows concerns that a member of the bench may have relied on AI-generated content while preparing a legal decision.

The guidelines emphasize that the core analytical function of a judge – interpreting law, weighing evidence and applying legal principles – must remain a human activity. They also note that, at present, no secure, institutionally approved generative AI tool exists for use by judges in the province. Without such a vetted system, the courts argue that any reliance on AI would conflict with the requirement for independent judicial judgment.

Quebec’s legal system currently lacks an officially sanctioned, secure AI platform that could be integrated into courtroom or deliberation processes. The absence of an approved tool means that any ad‑hoc or external AI applications would not meet the province’s standards for confidentiality, integrity and accountability.

The move comes amid broader discussions across Canada about the role of advanced technology in the justice sector. While some jurisdictions are exploring pilot programs for AI‑assisted legal research, Quebec’s stance underscores a cautionary approach, prioritising the preservation of judicial independence over potential efficiency gains.

By formalising the prohibition against substituting AI for judicial reasoning, the courts aim to reinforce public confidence in the decision‑making process. The guidelines also serve as a reminder to members of the judiciary that any experimentation with generative AI must await the development of a secure, officially endorsed system that satisfies the province’s rigorous standards.

The announcement marks a clear policy position from Quebec’s highest legal bodies, setting a benchmark for how provincial courts may address emerging technological pressures while safeguarding the fundamental principles of judicial autonomy.